Yes, there are more efficient methods to generate random numbers in the range of 1 to n where n is greater than 33000. One such method is the following:
This method takes advantage of the fact that a uniform distribution of integers in the range of 1 to n^2 is easy to generate using a standard random number generator, and that the probability of k being outside the range of 1 to n is very small. By reducing k modulo n and adding 1, we ensure that the resulting number is in the range of 1 to n with equal probability.
This method has a time complexity of O(1) and is therefore more efficient than other methods that require multiple random number generations or arithmetic operations.
Please start posting anonymously - your entry will be published after you log in or create a new account. This space is reserved only for answers. If you would like to engage in a discussion, please instead post a comment under the question or an answer that you would like to discuss
Asked: 2022-09-11 11:00:00 +0000
Seen: 15 times
Last updated: Nov 10 '21
What are the steps to utilize a for loop for generating and populating columns?
Does Logback generate a file that is empty each time the application begins?
How can printed output be utilized to generate a dataframe?
Is it impossible to generate a superuser in the Terminal for Postgres 14 on WSL or Linux?
How can I generate PEM certificates using .NET Framework 4.8?
Is it hard to generate an Identity matrix in Numpy by using the inverse of multiple matrices of A?