What are the differences between using Blazor Webassembly Window.visibilityStatus and JS interop?

edit

Blazor WebAssembly Window.visibilityStatus and JS interop are both used for similar purposes, but there are some key differences between the two.

1. Compatibility: Blazor WebAssembly Window.visibilityStatus is only available in Blazor WebAssembly projects, whereas JS interop can be used in both WebAssembly and Server projects.

2. Performance: Blazor WebAssembly Window.visibilityStatus provides a more efficient way of detecting window visibility changes as it utilizes Web APIs directly from within the .NET environment. On the other hand, JS interop requires the marshalling of objects between JavaScript and .NET, which can affect the performance.

3. Flexibility: JS interop provides more flexibility as it enables access to a broader range of web APIs and third-party libraries through JavaScript code. Blazor WebAssembly Window.visibilityStatus works only with browser-specific features.

4. Code management: Using Blazor WebAssembly Window.visibilityStatus results in a cleaner code base as it eliminates the need to write and manage additional interop code required for JS interop.

In summary, while both approaches provide similar functionality, Blazor WebAssembly Window.visibilityStatus provides a more efficient and streamlined approach with limited functionality while JS interop provides more flexibility and access to a broader range of web APIs but requires more complex implementation.