Yes, it is still relevant to measure IS and FID for evaluating the quality of generative models even if not using ImageNet. These metrics provide a quantitative measure of how similar the generated samples are to the real data in terms of their distribution and visual appearance, which can be useful for assessing the performance of a generative model in various applications. Additionally, there are alternative datasets that can be used for evaluating generative models outside of ImageNet, such as CIFAR-10, STL-10, and MNIST, among others.
Please start posting anonymously - your entry will be published after you log in or create a new account. This space is reserved only for answers. If you would like to engage in a discussion, please instead post a comment under the question or an answer that you would like to discuss
Asked: 2021-06-20 11:00:00 +0000
Seen: 15 times
Last updated: Oct 20 '21
What are the components that explain the state of ECMAScript execution context specification?
How can OMNET++ be used to simulate M/M/c/c?
How can I use oversampling to address a problem?
What is the method to determine the most precise categorization of data using Self Organizing Map?
Does the ZXing Android Embedded library have support for GS-1?
What are the steps required to utilize the LFW dataset in CNN-based face verification using Keras?
What is the reason for not being able to include CURDATE() in a check?